1. The smell of lilacs.
2. Butterflies' way of floating haphazardly yet lazily on warm breezes.
3. When dogs scratch their backs by rolling around, tongues lolling, unselfconscious.
4. Toddlers chasing bubble.
5. Sushi
6. Coffee--rich, dark, thick, creamy
7. The soft green grass under Grandma and Pop's tree.
8. Lichen on trees -- life is everywhere, life is ON life.
9. Squirrels -- mischief and fun
10. Birds -- innocence
11. Apple and cherry blossoms that hang off trees so heavily in the spring that you can shake a branch and have them flutter down like sweet-smelling snowflakes.
12. Horses' glossy necks and rolling eyes.
13. Glass bottles of different sizes and shapes
14. Star-shaped things
15. Home buying and decorating shows -- all the POSSIBILITIES of them! Which house to buy, what to do with it, so many things to discover!
16. Stuffed animals
17. Museums with old taxidermy exhibits -- animals hundreds of years dead preserved in glorious imperfection.
18. That rooting thing that toddler Juniper does when opening her mouth for a large bite of something -- a throwback to her days of breastfeeding and trying to latch onto my nipple. (It will surely vanish soon!)
19. Girls with tattooed backs
20. Grapes and berries popping sweetness in your mouth.
21. Creamy nutty sharpness of good cheese.
22. Red wine - sipping it, warming it in my hands, feeling its warmth spread throughout my body.
23. Sorrowful, wistful music
24. Bold jewelry - costume only of course
25. Sweet and salty
26. Watching a movie, then staying up all night to discuss it.
27. Ripe mango slices while reading the paper on a Sunday
28. Remembering things together - couple hood.
29. Old cemeteries -- lovely, dark, and peaceful.
30. Twisty tree branches
31. Pieces of furniture with numerous drawers
32. Round, unusual handwriting
33. Bacon that's crispy in parts, chewy in others
34. Cheap or even fake chocolate
35. Colonial villages where you can get lost in another time
36. Travel
37. Eating in restaurants -- SO MANY CHOICES! And you can have ANY of them!
38. Eating in restaurants -- captive audience for conversation
39. Coffehouses - lattes and tortes.
40. Art museums
41. Art museum patrons -- great fashion ideas in their self-consciously selected and artfully placed accessories and outfits.
42. Perfect days
43. Walking endlessly downtown -- looking at the harbor, stopping for lunch, having a coffee, shopping, etc.
44. Resale shops -- treasures for a song, and worn-in things with character
45. Smell of beer brewing
46. Remembering climbing the corn in the corncrib at Brandy's grandmother's house in completely inappropriate outfits.
47. Red shoes, mary jane shoes, especially red mary jane shoes
48. Marching bands
49. Visiting historical sites
50. Winged people - fairies, angels, cherubs...
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Paula Deen Notes
I object to it being said that she "MADE" people sick. She did not. First of all, chefs have been selling butter-and-lard laden recipe books since the dawn of time. Second, all of the scientific research into obesity that has NOT been conducted by someone trying to sell you something related to it (i.e. obesity drugs, surgical devices, etc.) has shown that people's bodies are very individual things, and that what might make one person obese will just cause another to gain 10lbs...and stay there. Furthermore, her choices about her body and career are just that...HER choices. Women have just as much right to eat whole sticks of butter and then decide they no longer wish to eat whole sticks of butter as they do to select birth control options and terminate pregnancies: the rules of bodily autonomy do not apply only to things we find aesthetically pleasing.
Ron, it's not like that at all. Cigarettes are unsafe and addictive, there is no "safe" number of cigarettes you can smoke--they are all harmful. Food, on the other hand, is something your body needs for fuel. I don't remember (but I'm not a PD follower, so maybe I just don't know about it?) Paula Deen saying that people should eat her fatty recipes to the exclusion of healthy ones--she just offers them up. It's up to us individually to select what foods we want for our own lifestyles. If someone wants to eat all Paula Deen recipes, all the time, go for it. But I don't think she's ever suggested such a thing.
Also, I get it. The fat southern lady with the funny accent who makes the white trash food has the diabetes. It's funny! Only it's not; it's not any funnier than if Gordon Ramsay's beef Wellingtons eventually led to HIM having type 2 diabetes. High-falutin' dishes are JUST as high in fat and calories as lowly gooey butter cakes.
t is "morally wrong" for her to act as a spokesperson for a drug she is taking to help control her disease? *Blink blink*. Whether or not she is able to lose the weight, this drug has been associated with a higher success rate of weight loss and diabetes control. She has every right to use it, and further to leverage her fame into spokesperson money. I think most anyone would do that, if given the opportunity. I mean, I'll gladly act as a spokesperson for my birth control or vitamins, any time they ask. Look, you can like her, you can hate her, you can like or hate her food and recipes. But her weight is not a moral issue, and it is not a moral failing. Food and weight are NOT moral issues--if all of America could just swallow that, we would probably have a lot less of the disordered eating that can lead to both obesity and anorexia/bulimia.
@Kemper -- I actually just happened to remember it from previous work I performed, but here is a link that discusses patient satisfaction, A1c control, and weight loss all being higher with Victoza than similar drugs. http://www.worldpharmanews.com/novonordisk/1391-patient-satisfaction-is-significantly-higher-with-injectable-victozar
And actually, for many patients, a drug IS necessary to control the disease. For some, eventually dietary and lifestyle changes are enough to keep it in check, but that is not true for everyone. Diet and exercise are NOT the "first remedy" for everyone--that all depends on quite a few chemical factors. The thing is, everyone is so hot to be all, "Oh, Paula Deen has type 2 diabetes?! Hardy har, OBVIOUSLY!", but it's not "obvious". We don't actually know what causes type 2 diabetes. While weight and diet are clearly correlating factors, they aren't the cause--or everyone who is overweight/obese or eats a poor diet would have type 2 diabetes. They don't.
And I totally agree that she IS a brand--I think that's probably why we're not hearing about all of this till now--her brand isn't exactly built on health food preparation. But I don't think she owed us a report of her diagnoses, whatever they may be--celeb or no, she gets to keep her medical history under wraps.
Look, I am not a Paula Deen fan. I don't believe that mayonnaise should get its own brick on the food pyramid. But I really object to her being painted as though she has been selling us poison and now is shilling antidote. She didn't. She provided recipes. We could choose to make a dish each day, eat nothing but a spoonful of it, and throw the rest out; thereby slowly starving ourselves. Or we could choose to make 5 of her dishes every day and scarf them all while sitting on a pile of dead puppies. It's in our hands.
Ron, it's not like that at all. Cigarettes are unsafe and addictive, there is no "safe" number of cigarettes you can smoke--they are all harmful. Food, on the other hand, is something your body needs for fuel. I don't remember (but I'm not a PD follower, so maybe I just don't know about it?) Paula Deen saying that people should eat her fatty recipes to the exclusion of healthy ones--she just offers them up. It's up to us individually to select what foods we want for our own lifestyles. If someone wants to eat all Paula Deen recipes, all the time, go for it. But I don't think she's ever suggested such a thing.
Also, I get it. The fat southern lady with the funny accent who makes the white trash food has the diabetes. It's funny! Only it's not; it's not any funnier than if Gordon Ramsay's beef Wellingtons eventually led to HIM having type 2 diabetes. High-falutin' dishes are JUST as high in fat and calories as lowly gooey butter cakes.
t is "morally wrong" for her to act as a spokesperson for a drug she is taking to help control her disease? *Blink blink*. Whether or not she is able to lose the weight, this drug has been associated with a higher success rate of weight loss and diabetes control. She has every right to use it, and further to leverage her fame into spokesperson money. I think most anyone would do that, if given the opportunity. I mean, I'll gladly act as a spokesperson for my birth control or vitamins, any time they ask. Look, you can like her, you can hate her, you can like or hate her food and recipes. But her weight is not a moral issue, and it is not a moral failing. Food and weight are NOT moral issues--if all of America could just swallow that, we would probably have a lot less of the disordered eating that can lead to both obesity and anorexia/bulimia.
@Kemper -- I actually just happened to remember it from previous work I performed, but here is a link that discusses patient satisfaction, A1c control, and weight loss all being higher with Victoza than similar drugs. http://www.worldpharmanews.com/novonordisk/1391-patient-satisfaction-is-significantly-higher-with-injectable-victozar
And actually, for many patients, a drug IS necessary to control the disease. For some, eventually dietary and lifestyle changes are enough to keep it in check, but that is not true for everyone. Diet and exercise are NOT the "first remedy" for everyone--that all depends on quite a few chemical factors. The thing is, everyone is so hot to be all, "Oh, Paula Deen has type 2 diabetes?! Hardy har, OBVIOUSLY!", but it's not "obvious". We don't actually know what causes type 2 diabetes. While weight and diet are clearly correlating factors, they aren't the cause--or everyone who is overweight/obese or eats a poor diet would have type 2 diabetes. They don't.
And I totally agree that she IS a brand--I think that's probably why we're not hearing about all of this till now--her brand isn't exactly built on health food preparation. But I don't think she owed us a report of her diagnoses, whatever they may be--celeb or no, she gets to keep her medical history under wraps.
Look, I am not a Paula Deen fan. I don't believe that mayonnaise should get its own brick on the food pyramid. But I really object to her being painted as though she has been selling us poison and now is shilling antidote. She didn't. She provided recipes. We could choose to make a dish each day, eat nothing but a spoonful of it, and throw the rest out; thereby slowly starving ourselves. Or we could choose to make 5 of her dishes every day and scarf them all while sitting on a pile of dead puppies. It's in our hands.
Thursday, January 12, 2012
Week 1 Exercises
If I'm going to make a go of this thing, I have to do it. So here we go.
Time Travel - List 3 Old Enemies of Your Creative Self-Worth
1. Many a teacher I had during my catholic school years, with the librarian, Sister Francis Miriam, leading the way in General Horridness.
2. Mean classmates I had during the same years; classmates who did all they could to make me feel awful and worthless. They really were quite successful.
3. Myself. After the influence of both of the above, I think I became my own worst enemy. Constantly questioning my ability, myself; constantly telling myself how untalented and unworthy I am. Bad stuff.
Time Travel: Select and Write Out One Story From Your Monster Hall of Fame
In keeping with #1, above, I'm going to recount one particularly terrible story about Sister Francis Miriam, the meanest librarian ever known. I was an advanced reader from a fairly young age, and I tended to favor books that would have been far beyond most of my classmates. For the most part (although, honestly, not always), I understood them. Sometimes, I didn't entirely "get" them or didn't pick up the double entendre, but hell, that could be said about many people. Anyway, I no longer remember how old I was at the time, but I remember that I wanted to check out a series of 2 books, one of them "The Hobbit" and one of them a book I had already read previously (I think it was "Cougar", but I can't swear to it). She flatly refused to let me get either book, and probably said something nasty. I was humiliated and flustered, and ended up selecting a book about dog care called "A Puppy For You" (I was a bit obsessed with animals and pets!) Well, when she checked it out, she laughed out loud at me and announced to my class in a snide, mocking voice, "Hahaha, would you look at that? I told Amanda she couldn't check out XYZ and look what she chose instead. 'A Puppy For You'. HAHAHAHA!" I remember the way the hard wooden chair felt pressed against my thighs, I remember cutting my eyes furiously at her, sending her daggers of hatred. But mostly I remember how humiliated I was, how much I just plain didn't want to be there, didn't want to ever draw attention to myself by trying to be smart again. God, what a bitch she was. Why was it necessary to be so cruel and hateful?
Write a letter to the editor in your defense
Dear Editor,
Sister Francis Miriam shouldn't have been so mean to Amanda. She only wanted to check out a book to read so she could have a way to escape her miserable life, and Sister was mean and nasty. Amanda should be able to check out whatever book she wants from the school library -- we only go from grades K - 8, so there really isn't much danger of her reading something "inappropriate" for her. We're all close to the same age, and if she can understand those thick books I think she should be able to read them. Furthermore, there is nothing wrong with reading a book that is not particularly challenging. We all need to relax and enjoy ourselves; everything shouldn't be a chore.
I also am made to understand that it was Sister Francis Miriam who once said to Amanda (who was bored in a class that she was probably too smart for and doodling on her notebook), "A doodle is a sign of a weak mind." Obviously, that's a completely untrue statement. I have a feeling that brilliant people have been doodling to help themselves work things out, keep their minds occupied, and just plain for fun since time began. Probably, doodling is actually a sign of a strong mind.
Sister Francis Miriam really is a bitch, sir. Let's keep her away from poor sweet Amanda.
Yours Truly,
Fake Me
Ok, that's enough for tonight.
Time Travel - List 3 Old Enemies of Your Creative Self-Worth
1. Many a teacher I had during my catholic school years, with the librarian, Sister Francis Miriam, leading the way in General Horridness.
2. Mean classmates I had during the same years; classmates who did all they could to make me feel awful and worthless. They really were quite successful.
3. Myself. After the influence of both of the above, I think I became my own worst enemy. Constantly questioning my ability, myself; constantly telling myself how untalented and unworthy I am. Bad stuff.
Time Travel: Select and Write Out One Story From Your Monster Hall of Fame
In keeping with #1, above, I'm going to recount one particularly terrible story about Sister Francis Miriam, the meanest librarian ever known. I was an advanced reader from a fairly young age, and I tended to favor books that would have been far beyond most of my classmates. For the most part (although, honestly, not always), I understood them. Sometimes, I didn't entirely "get" them or didn't pick up the double entendre, but hell, that could be said about many people. Anyway, I no longer remember how old I was at the time, but I remember that I wanted to check out a series of 2 books, one of them "The Hobbit" and one of them a book I had already read previously (I think it was "Cougar", but I can't swear to it). She flatly refused to let me get either book, and probably said something nasty. I was humiliated and flustered, and ended up selecting a book about dog care called "A Puppy For You" (I was a bit obsessed with animals and pets!) Well, when she checked it out, she laughed out loud at me and announced to my class in a snide, mocking voice, "Hahaha, would you look at that? I told Amanda she couldn't check out XYZ and look what she chose instead. 'A Puppy For You'. HAHAHAHA!" I remember the way the hard wooden chair felt pressed against my thighs, I remember cutting my eyes furiously at her, sending her daggers of hatred. But mostly I remember how humiliated I was, how much I just plain didn't want to be there, didn't want to ever draw attention to myself by trying to be smart again. God, what a bitch she was. Why was it necessary to be so cruel and hateful?
Write a letter to the editor in your defense
Dear Editor,
Sister Francis Miriam shouldn't have been so mean to Amanda. She only wanted to check out a book to read so she could have a way to escape her miserable life, and Sister was mean and nasty. Amanda should be able to check out whatever book she wants from the school library -- we only go from grades K - 8, so there really isn't much danger of her reading something "inappropriate" for her. We're all close to the same age, and if she can understand those thick books I think she should be able to read them. Furthermore, there is nothing wrong with reading a book that is not particularly challenging. We all need to relax and enjoy ourselves; everything shouldn't be a chore.
I also am made to understand that it was Sister Francis Miriam who once said to Amanda (who was bored in a class that she was probably too smart for and doodling on her notebook), "A doodle is a sign of a weak mind." Obviously, that's a completely untrue statement. I have a feeling that brilliant people have been doodling to help themselves work things out, keep their minds occupied, and just plain for fun since time began. Probably, doodling is actually a sign of a strong mind.
Sister Francis Miriam really is a bitch, sir. Let's keep her away from poor sweet Amanda.
Yours Truly,
Fake Me
Ok, that's enough for tonight.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)